Admission Essay Editing

Admission Essay Editing Admission Essay Editing Admission Essay Editing Writing admission essays is a lengthy process. However, even if everything is ok from your point of view, admission essay editing should not be neglected. It is worth to read your admission essay several times while editing the content of the paper as well as editing grammar and spelling errors. Editing admission essay allows you to refrain from repetition and to avoid stylistic errors. Admission essay topics may be different while the rules of editing are the same for all writings. Just follow the paper editing tips below and you will polish your writing. It is always better to read your writing from the first word until the last one. In addition, you should start editing essay with punctuation without paying attention to the spelling. Next, read admission essay in back order (from the last paragraph to the first) editing spelling. While editing spelling errors in the normal reading order, you will pay attention only to the meaning of readable proposals and might skip many mistakes. So, in the process of admission essay editing, ask yourself some questions about content of the paper. Keep in mind that content is the message you want to convey to the reader. Usually, the content of your admission essay is very difficult to evaluate. The only thing to do is to put aside your admission essay and write a brief message that you want to put in your paper. Then, finish writing introduction and conclusion and read main part of the paper. While editing, ask yourself whether the meaning of your admission essay is the same as in the short entries. If yes, it is good. Not really? Ask yourself the following questions to enhance admission essay editing: Does the paper answer all posed questions? If not, then you have problems: paper has to be rewritten. At best, squeeze missing information. But if you have enough time to rewrite your admission essay, you should not hesitate to start writing from scratch again. Does each point have supporting example? Even if you think that admission essay editing does not require examples, you will definitely find some inappropriate or unnecessary information in your writing. Exert your imagination, rummage in your memory and you will find wealth of interesting and relevant examples. Are the examples convincing, and, most importantly, are they personal? It is the best question for editing. Let's start with the last part. It is a bad idea to write à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“my friend made the same. In this case, more than ever the word à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“I is appreciated. While checking persuasiveness turn to Critical Reasoning. Does the argument stand a criticism? Is the argument flawless? Alternatively, you may order custom admission essay writing at and we will edit or write from scratch your admission essay.

The Donation of Constantine

The Donation of Constantine The Donation of Constantine  (Donatio Constantini, or sometimes just Donatio) is one of the best-known forgeries in European history. It is a medieval document which pretends to have been written in the early fourth century, giving large areas of land and related political power, as well as religious authority, to Pope Sylvester I (in power from 314 – 335 CE) and his successors. It had a little immediate impact after being written but grew to be heavily influential as time went on.​​ Origins of the Donation We’re not certain who faked the Donation, but it seems to have been written circa 750-800 CE in Latin. It might be connected to the coronation of Pippin the Short in 754 CE, or the grand imperial coronation of Charlemagne in 800 CE, but could easily have been to aid Papal attempts to challenge Byzantium’s spiritual and secular interests in Italy. One of the more popular views has the Donation being created in the mid-eighth century at the behest of Pope Stephen II, in order to aid his negotiations with Pepin. The idea was that the Pope approved the transfer of the great central European crown from the Merovingian dynasty to the Carolingians, and in return, Pepin would not just give the Papacy the rights to Italian lands, but would actually ‘restore’ what had been given long before by Constantine. It appears that the rumor of a Donation or something similar had been traveling around the relevant parts of Europe since the sixth century and that whoever create d it was producing something people expected to exist. Contents of the Donation The Donation begins with a narrative: Sylvester I was supposed to have cured Roman Emperor Constantine of leprosy before the latter gave his support to Rome and the Pope as the heart of the church. It then moves into the granting of rights, a ‘donation’ to the church: the Pope is made the supreme religious ruler of many great capitals- including the newly expanded Constantinople- and given control of all the lands given to the church throughout Constantine’s empire. The Pope is also given the Imperial Palace in Rome and the western empire, and the ability to appoint all kings and emperors ruling there. What this meant, if it had been true, was that the Papacy had the legal right to rule a large area of Italy in a secular fashion, which it did during the medieval period. History of the Donation Despite containing such a massive benefit to the papacy, the document appears to have been forgotten in the ninth and tenth centuries, when struggles between Rome and Constantinople raged over who was superior, and when the Donation would have been useful. It wasn’t until Leo IX in the mid-eleventh century that the Donation was quoted as evidence, and from then on it became a common weapon in the struggle between the church and secular rulers to carve up power. Its legitimacy was rarely questioned, although there were dissenting voices. The Renaissance Destroys the Donation In 1440 a Renaissance Humanist called Valla published a work which broke the Donation down and examined it: the ‘Discourse on the Forgery of the Alleged Donation of Constantine. Valla applied the textual criticism and interest in history and classics which grew so prominent in the Renaissance to show, among many criticisms and in an attacking style we might not consider academic these days, that the Donation was not written in the fourth century. Once Valla had published his proof, the Donation was increasingly seen as a forgery, and the church couldn’t rely on it. Valla’s attack on the Donation helped promote humanist study and in a small way helped lead to the Reformation.